Betsy Johnson & Marta Tiefenthaler in Conversation

Hailing from the working-class fishing port of Grimsby, England, Betsy Johnson is one of those rare cultural multihyphenates—stylist, creative director, artist, designer, photographer, storyteller—who quietly transforms the visual language of fashion. Her influence unfolds subtly; you don’t always notice it until you can trace it back to one of her references. Her British roots inform a hard-edged style that shifts between minimalism and maximalism, punk and glamorous, dark and light. It is precisely these contradictions that have made her so successful in inventing a unique sartorial lexicon. For Betsy Johnson, work is the process, and the process is inseparable from the work itself. In response to the Work In Progress theme, objects found in Betsy’s home and studio were categorized—collateral of the creative process.

Austrian-born Martina Tiefenthaler, who served as Chief Creative Officer at Balenciaga during Demna’s highly successful ten-year tenure, approaches fashion with equal singularity. With a background in architecture, she provided a rigorously engineered foundation for the house’s reinvention of the modern silhouette. Tiefenthaler continues to reinvent herself and her practice through her recent ventures in coaching and image making. In the following conversation, Johnson and Tiefenthaler discuss the power of objects to hold memory, the role of emotional intuition amid commercial pressures, and the importance of holistic, human-centered leadership in creative industries. The pair posed themselves both the question: are you materialistic and do you hold on to things?

BETSY JOHNSON I didn’t think I held onto things, but I’ve been told that I’m a hoarder. (laughs) I hold onto everything from shoots: plane tickets, handwritten notes, props, labels, and a lot of printed materials. So, I’m materialistic in that way, but I don’t buy things. What about you?

MARTINA TIEFENTHALER: I do know I’m a hoarder. People don’t have to tell me. (laughs) I’m a trained designer, so the way that I look at things is really like, What’s the color, the touch of the material, the functionality, the context, who made it? How old is it? When I look at an item, it gives me information, which relates to a feeling—it makes me laugh or remember something that I had as a child, or the color makes me remember something. So, with the amount of things I own I probably look materialistic to other people, but I don’t think I am.

JOHNSON: That makes perfect sense. Most of the clothes I keep are like a pair of football shorts from when I was five years old. I keep them somewhere thrown in the corner of my closet, and somehow having these personal effects helps steer the work. Or if I feel like I’m losing touch with my creative path, I always go back to these notes and objects. They help re-center me.

TIEFENTHALER: As creatives, we need informative material. That can either be physical: objects, products, material, or it can be digital, like imagery. And then, the third category is everything that you have saved in your mind: memories, conversations, ideas. We need all this informative material to feed the process and to continue doing the job. The part that I’ve always liked about my job is that I’m able to go into moments of research, collect things, make edits, and then decide what is relevant right now to kick off the creation process. As a designer, being a hoarder comes in handy.

JOHNSON: There’s something you just said about feeling, which relates to something I was telling my mom recently. I told her, “I’m experiencing multiple layers of reality because when you have something physical or visual that you’re dealing with, it takes you back to a feeling or an opinion you have on something. That opinion then becomes contextualized by the image or the object. All of it gets layered together, and boom, there’s the idea. A lot of people now have a concept and a reference, but they’re missing the emotional aspect that ties the whole thing together.

TIEFENTHALER: I totally agree. So much of my career has been very commercial, with the primary target of generating revenue through sales. No matter how much I was telling myself that I was working for companies that were more on the conceptual side, the truth is, they had a commercial purpose. And as a professional creative, you have to fit into frames, whether it’s timing or other constraints, but you have to shoot ideas all the time, which can be tough. So, you learn how to work ignoring your feelings, coming up with more ideas, whether they’re good or not. Sometimes you have to go with an idea because the deadline is there and the timeline doesn’t allow the process to continue. That’s why I like to talk about feelings. It’s ironic that you want to create something that makes you feel good when you wear it, but the structures in which we work make it difficult to feel good.

JOHNSON: That’s interesting because my career is freelance. So, the balance between the commercial work and my personal practice sometimes gives me whiplash. You do have to shut down your emotions. Sometimes I went wrong in my formative years by approaching commercial work as if it were my personal practice. I would treat a commercial project as if it were my child. It was a process for me to find the balance between doing the job well and separating myself. Sometimes I take on back-to-back commercials, where there are tons of people and so many different expectations. Then, I need to find respite in the personal.

TIEFENTHALER: Yeah, that’s something I’m doing, working on non-commercial, artistic projects. Doing that has always been a tool for me to take a breath and do things at my own pace. If you don’t have to sell and you don’t have anyone telling you when something has to be ready, you actually experience ultimate freedom. The process is my goal, rather than the outcome itself.

JOHNSON: Do you ever sit on projects for ages? Sometimes I work on something personal, and I sit on it for two or three years. I either forget I’ve done it, or I’m too much of a perfectionist and never feel it's ready to put it out.

TIEFENTHALER: Having worked in given structures, I always thought that a project is something that has a starting point, the process, and the result. Therefore doing things that may never come out or don’t have an ending cannot be defined as projects. But with the new freedom I have, I’m trying to question how I was trained to label the way I work, and I want to get rid of labels. So, I would say I’m currently busy with a hundred projects, some of them are running for ages. They’re like different channels, some exist only in my mind.

JOHNSON: It’s refreshing to hear this. I had a long-term retainer project and after that I’ve been more into personal creative research and development. But it’s been interesting to explain to my accountant where all the money went. I was like, “I’ve been in research and development.” And they’re like, “But you’ve been trying this and you’ve been trying that.” And I’m like, “Yes.” Because when I enjoy where something is going, I have to just let it unfold, and then another path makes itself known. It’s not through anyone wanting to pay me to do something, but just because something presents itself, and that leads to another thing. So, on paper, I might be working on somewhere between sixteen to twenty projects, but it’s probably only three with some sort of timeline. What you’re saying is reassuring to me, because I can really start to wonder what I’m doing. It can feel like everyone’s focusing on their one thing and doing it well, and maybe I just have ADHD. But actually, it’s just the process of doing.

TIEFENTHALER: We have to get to know ourselves as individuals and figure out how we like to operate. At the beginning of our careers, when we learn, we need other people to show us how things are being done. Then it takes time and experience to find our own ways, and it would be easier to establish these if we were all to stop trying to put people into drawers, saying, “Okay, this is what they do, and that’s the number of projects that they do, so that’s how successful they are.” It’s complete nonsense. I’m astonished by how we hold onto this way of thinking as a community and as an industry. It’s all about who’s hot, who’s not, who’s busy, who’s successful. It’s very degrading, and it doesn’t make the community any richer, it’s really destructive.

JOHNSON: It makes a lot of people lie, also. They like to inflate what they’re doing, and then it becomes this pissing contest of who’s doing what. To me, the goal is to be less busy, so you can then figure shit out. What’s ironic is, all of the least successful projects that I’ve had on paper—whether it be financially or social media engagement—are my favorite things I’ve done so far. And all the things where everyone’s like, “Wow, that thing was so cool,” I’m like cringing inside.

TIEFENTHALER: I understand. Often the more liked projects by the audience are the less liked projects by the creator. The challenge is: what do we do with the audience? How much do we need it? Do we really care about it? In an industry that is so much about looks, I’m still struggling to find my way of dealing with it. You don’t need the audience in order to be creative, and that’s very liberating. Nobody can hold you back other than yourself. You will always have people who like what you do and people who don’t.

JOHNSON: Do you believe in networking? It’s something I’m terrible at. Sometimes I think I need to go out and see things, and then I don’t because I have anxiety and am a bit of a hermit. I’m curious about your take on this.

TIEFENTHALER: I’m not very good at it because I’d rather cook dinner at home and go to bed early than spend a night with people who make me feel weird being around them. But the work we do relies on teamwork, and having clients, and that only works if you are in touch with people. It’s wise to create your own community. I don’t think you have to attend all the events. But maybe calling someone and say: let’s meet and have a coffee together, is a good way of connecting. To me this is completely new (laughs), I was always hiding in the office, I like it.

JOHNSON: I don’t know about you, but when I was at school, I wasn’t really popular. Then, I left my hometown, did all these things, and out of nowhere some people thought I was cool. It was a strange phenomenon when I was about twenty-three to come into this industry that’s so based on being cool, and then you have people thinking you’re cool. But not everyone has the best intentions when they want to be your friend, especially in those spaces, so going through that and coming out the other side has been a strange but nice journey. How was your transition into this weird space?

TIEFENTHALER: I don’t walk around thinking that people find me cool. This is something I’d rather question. If someone tells me that they find me cool, I feel flattered, and I’m happy to hear it. But if you don’t think you’re cool, you don’t have to maintain it. And instead of aspiring to be cool, you can aspire to be content.

JOHNSON: I agree. Your life is just what you are doing minute to minute, so you have to enjoy what you’re doing. My team is crucial to my livelihood and even my mental well-being. They are the people I talk to every day. It truly is a collaborative effort, and this is what makes me really happy.

When you have an “online image,” you do one post and people form opinions, and that’s how they perceive you.

TIEFENTHALER: People read code unconsciously. You see something, and then it reminds you of something else. So you code what you see. For many years, I’ve been dressed only in black, and nobody ever asked me why. Everyone just thought, she’s goth, and I’m totally not goth. I don’t like the music, and I don’t know much about the culture. I started dressing in black because I had an intense job creating thousands of products per season. Working on colors, materials, shapes, forms, silhouettes—the whole day. I simply didn’t have the inspiration in the morning to style my looks. It was easier for me in the morning to choose an outfit based on my feeling: choosing only the fit and the fabric that I wanted to feel on my skin that day, not also the color. It was a very pragmatic decision. But people reading codes thought, she’s a dark, tough bitch. (laughs) But I don’t think I am. I always thought fashion people should know better, but maybe they don’t want to know better.

JOHNSON: For sure. It’s funny, though, no one thought I was goth; they just thought I was a bitch. (laughs) There’s this thing about automating as many aspects of your life as possible, so you can do what you want to do with your mind. I’ve been wearing the same cargo pants for maybe five years. I have three pairs because I wear them every single day when I’m working. It allows me to get on with my shit, and it’s the same for my team. When I’m looking at all these pieces, I don’t want my team to be in anything but black. I can’t be distracted. I just need to lock in. But yeah, someone saying, “I thought you were a total bitch before I met you,”—that sentence in itself is wild.

TIEFENTHALER: Ultimately, you gotta be quite fierce in order to make it, because there are quite a lot of people, often men, standing in your way. So, how do you get through this barrier? You have to have thick skin. It’s easy for other people to say, “Look at her. She’s doing well. She must be a bitch.” But it’s so destructive. Why not say, “Oh, she’s successful. She must be really good at what she does.”

JOHNSON: It’s very counterproductive to getting more women in spaces. I want to ask about your coaching, because it’s only been the past year, but half the time when I was going through a rough patch, my team became the reason I kept making things. I was getting more out of mentoring people on my team, and that back-and-forth mentorship became so focal to me. That’s something that I wasn’t expecting. I don’t know if this nurturing side of things has to do with being a woman.

TIEFENTHALER: I enjoy the coaching, as it’s about the human. A lot of people in the business don’t dare to let out their human side, men or women. Though in our industry, it’s all about team work, it’s rarely something you can do completely on your own. The one thing we do the whole day is communicate with other humans. Secondary to that, we create, we design, we direct, we style. It’s helpful to be human and prioritize the way we work together.

JOHNSON: When we’re in fitting, we’ll always joke and I’ll say, “It’s a safe space.” Our job is to try rubbish and most of it won’t look great, but it’s that one thing we find in the fifty things that’s good. This industry can be so narcissistic, and it has this social side that can be not just mentally, but also physically unhealthy. You don’t get the best out of people in these toxic environments.

TIEFENTHALER: Yes. I think this is because it’s a race for very few seats. If we gave the same attention and value to all the different roles, the whole atmosphere would relax. Likewise, if we focus all our attention as a company on two or three people, then the tension begins because it feels like there’s not enough space for everyone. These environments become very toxic because everyone’s worried they could be kicked out at any minute. I do not believe the artist has to suffer in order to create. It’s a myth.

JOHNSON: I’ve met a few people along my journey who romanticize this, and I’ve clapped back like, “Look, I’ve been a struggling creative. It’s not a nice place to be. It’s something that you spend every day trying not to be. But it’s your mindset, or your financial position, or sociopolitical situation that you’re in. I don’t want to be suffering. I want to be doing yoga, eating good food. I want to be on a call with a team that I love. A suffering artist is the last thing I want to go back to.” I know people who have chosen that facade, and I don’t know how real it is to them or what they’re actually experiencing, but it’s absurd to me.

TIEFENTHALER: It’s usually the non-creative people who have this idea. But providing a nice environment means better business too. People quit less, they are more invested and have fun doing what they do.

JOHNSON: The premise of creativity is to play. You have to feel safe like a child and protected by your leadership, so that you can feel relaxed enough to venture into the creative process. When I’m hiring people, I’m looking for people who are just obsessed with what they do. They’re the people who really show up every day and contribute to the creative conversation that we’re having. They’re not looking side to side, and they don’t care about what anyone else is doing inside or outside our studio.

TIEFENTHALER: I have to say, (laughs) almost everyone I know isn’t able to do that. But, of course, if the target is to sell and the industry is competitive, the orientation doesn’t go straightforward; it goes left and right and backwards. It’s also called merchandising. A threat to creativity. I have made many mistakes in my career, and I take responsibility for those mistakes. However, when I analyze why I made poor decisions or behaved in a way that I’m not proud of, it’s mostly because I felt unsafe. I was irritated in some way, and that causes you to lose focus.

JOHNSON: The industry can really make monsters of some people, but are you optimistic?

TIEFENTHALER: Generally speaking, I’m both pessimistic and optimistic. I’m an extremely sensitive person. So when I read the news, I’m a pessimist. I do not see anyone getting it together or making change for the better. However, I love creating, and I’ve realized creating is an optimistic act. Like to cook for example, it’s a tool to survive. I want to be alive, I want to be healthy, and I want to take care of myself.

JOHNSON: When I learned you were vegan through mutual friends, I was like, Wait, what? Someone who cares about the planet, about their body and themselves, is clearly self-aware and aware of the world around them, but is also in this really high position in an industry that doesn’t care about any of those things. This person exists?

It was reassuring because I can remember my first fashion week in London. I was nineteen, from Manchester, staying on someone’s sofa, and I just called my mom and cried hysterically. I was like, “Oh, this isn’t for me.” I thought I might find a corner for myself in fashion, but it ended up feeling like it was in complete opposition to who I was fundamentally. I felt like these people don’t talk about the things I find interesting. They don’t do things I find interesting. But people think they’re important and want to take their photographs. It felt like my whole world was shattered. She really talked me off a ledge and was like, “I think that’s good. You’re not interested in those things, but you like what you do. You know what you want for yourself. Ignore all of that. They don’t have to be your people.” That helped a lot. And over the years, I’ve found people that I do resonate with.

TIEFENTHALER: I relate to that a lot. Life is a journey of figuring out where you want to be. Where is your place at a particular moment in time, and do you feel content with the place that you have chosen? It’s a process. You can also make peace with sometimes making the wrong choices. Once you realize that life is trial and error, you try things out. If they work, you stick around. If they don’t, try to get out of there. That’s good advice if you want to have a career in fashion. If you end up being with a group of people who like to talk about the same things you like to talk about, then that’s the right place to stick around. But you need a bit of time to find that environment.

JOHNSON: Yeah, that’s how I ended up feeling. This last year, I’ve been the most content. On paper, and in other people’s eyes with whatever metrics they’re using, I’ve maybe been the least successful. But I’m happier in my day-to-day routine than I’ve ever been in my life, and growing. It feels like I’m just getting started.

Marcella Zimmermann


interview by Kaitlin Phillips
photographs by Mike Vitelli

You can pass through many workplaces in New York City without coming across anyone completely suited to their career. Once you find such a person, it’s a quiet inspiration. People like to fight the notion that you are what you do—but in the cases where it’s true, I can’t think of a better scenario. Such is the situation with Marcella Zimmermann, founder and CEO of Digital Counsel. It’s not enough to say she works harder than everyone else. Though she is a workaholic, I think it was something subtler: there wasn’t a situation where she didn’t know what to do. This makes her aptly suited to her profession. Communications is a protean environment. What’s true one day is not true the next. This holds true in everything from the smallest detail (one editor will tell you they’d never cover such a story, while the person one cubicle over will assign it) to the largest (publicity isn’t magazines anymore). More importantly—because being able to do your job, while novel, shouldn’t be the highest bar—Marcella is one of those old school publicists, with the glamor and cultural relevance that it connotes. But I mean this literally, she was trained in the old world, and yet has chosen to pioneer a new lane in marketing. I can’t think of anyone more committed to leveraging new direct means of communicating with audiences, far beyond the printed word.

PHILLIPS: You didn’t go to college, you didn’t study communications, and you didn’t have a traditional route to a career. You do, however, know a lot of interesting people and have always been at the intersection of many cultural conversations. What were some of the first jobs that led to your work in PR, and how did this transition to Digital Counsel happen?

ZIMMERMANN: Thank you for asking because a lot of people don’t realize I’m out of the PR game! Okay, so how it all started: when I moved to New York after high school, I started my first agency, New York Art Department, where I was as much on Tumblr and Reddit as I was in the art world. I became obsessed with Nyan Cat, which I believed could be the next Hello Kitty. I cold-messaged the creator, pitched a group show at The Hole, and convinced artists like Tom Sachs and Virgil Abloh’s [streetwear label and music collective] Been Trill to reimagine it. The show got written up by The New York Times and became my first big client project. From there, I worked at VICE, where I launched Madonna’s first global digital art initiative “Art for Freedom” before moving into PR under one of New York’s most iconic publicists.

PHILLIPS: Nadine Johnson!

ZIMMERMANN: Yup! That role gave me a traditional crash course: pitching stories, managing red carpets, seating galas with sticky notes, planting items in Page Six. It was valuable training, but I realized my passion was working directly with artists and building experiences. So, I launched Foundations magazine with my best friend, the art dealer Sebastian Gladstone, profiling then “emerging” artists like Jamian Juliano-Villani and Jessi Reaves. Carly Mark from Puppets Puppets was an editor, too. In 2015, I helped start the PR firm Cultural Counsel. After nearly a decade there, I spun off Digital Counsel, the independent company I own and run today.

PHILLIPS: Communications is becoming a more niche-y, specialized field as traditional media platforms lose influence and non-traditional platforms expand. To meet this new world, you've rapidly expanded in a direction that I genuinely don't even totally understand. What's your lane? What are you doing that other people aren't doing?

ZIMMERMANN: Yes, the trad media game has been completely maimed. The real gatekeepers now are the platforms and algorithms, not editors. Artists, brands, and institutions don’t just need to get in the door anymore—they need to build trust and context directly with their audiences. That’s my lane.

The difference with Digital Counsel is that my team isn’t made up of communications majors or “social media managers”—we’re practicing artists, extremely online content creators, serious paid media experts, and hardcore engineers. I’m the only “traditional” communications person on staff!

We try to treat social media campaigns the same way a curator approaches exhibition wall-text. We start with core messaging: What is the idea? The thesis? Who’s the intended audience? Then we radiate outward—how does that message get adapted for a website, an Instagram Reel, a TikTok moment, a board report, an ad campaign?

PHILLIPS: So, you're bullish on the importance of being your own media?

ZIMMERMANN: Absolutely. In the future of culture, the competition isn’t just the gallery down the street—it’s the Kardashians, OnlyFans, Labubu, Netflix, AI slop cat videos. That’s the landscape. For the arts sector, it shouldn’t be about chasing a million views; it’s about building trust and having confidence that your voice and vision will find its audience through consistency.

The truth is, cutting through the noise is harder for the arts. Quick hits like when a museum’s plunky social media manager co-opts a meme-y trend like Girl Dinner, it might seem rewarding in the moment but there’s no lasting impact. And it’s cringe. What does last is the relationships you build with your audience. When people return to you because they trust your perspective, that’s the kind of sustained engagement that carries further than random short-term new followers, or a single headline, no matter how meaningful the coverage. That’s real influence.

PHILLIPS: How are you defining influence? Do you have a number in mind? I'll give a dumb example, there was a moment when having 200,000 Instagram followers mattered. It felt like those people were kind of famous, and now I think that number is a million.

ZIMMERMANN: I wish I could give you a number—like, “in 2025, you need 1.4 million followers”—but we all know that game is pretty hollow. You can have hundreds of thousands of followers and still be screaming into the void if nothing actually sticks. Visibility alone doesn’t equal influence.

And I don’t care much about likes or views anymore. The signals that matter are saves and shares. A save means something was valuable enough to hold onto; a share means it became part of someone else’s self-expression. That’s the level of connection we’re chasing—not vanity numbers, but work that people want to carry forward.

PHILLIPS: You’ve always gone back to the same sort of thing where you connect businesses and artists and art, seamlessly, with no effort. I’d love to get a clear picture of what you’re going to accomplish at your company, say, next week. What is going to happen from Monday to Friday?

ZIMMERMANN: Each weekday, my team and I make our way to the Lower East Side, where our studio is on the top floor of the former e-flux building. No two weeks look the same, but the rhythm is a balance: a lot of calls, a million decks, client meetings paired with crits, watching films, keeping an intense media diet, going to openings, and spending time in artists’ studios. That mix of structured work and cultural immersion is what keeps our practice both rigorous and alive to what’s happening around us.

Next week, for instance, we’re developing the annual plan for Hyundai Artlab’s channels, treating it the way a museum might plan an exhibition season: outlining themes, identifying new voices, mapping cultural touchpoints, and then translating those into video, editorial, advertising, web, and social. Meanwhile, I’ll be running around to the Independent and Armory Show. We’re also preparing the launch of Eva Foundation, a new arts space in Bucharest dedicated to women artists that we helped brand. And the release of the new Different Leaf magazine, which will be guest edited by the artist Nick Cave, who just had that great show at Jack Shainman. Just lots happening all the time!

PHILLIPS: I feel like it was really prescient and smart to found a digital-focused company. Was this a natural move skills-wise or was there a bit of a learning curve?

 
 

ZIMMERMANN: The move was natural in spirit, but it came with a real crash course. I had the soft skills from PR—intuition, relationships, timing—but suddenly had to master hard skills like paid media, analytics, and the language of engineers and technologists. With AI making many hard skills more accessible, soft skills will matter more than ever—but they can’t stand alone. Taste, empathy, cultural fluency, the ability to anticipate how a story will land—those are the qualities that make work feel alive rather than manufactured.

At the same time, instincts need structure. To make them actionable, you have to understand distribution—how media is bought, how algorithms surface content, how to measure impact. The future lies in the interplay: soft skills provide the “why” and “what,” hard skills ensure the “how” and “where.” Together they let ideas not just travel, but take root in culture.

PHILLIPS: Can you share any more about those numbers, those internal metrics for success today?

ZIMMERMANN: Platforms give you the obvious surface metrics—reach, impressions, likes, comments, follower counts. Those are important, but where we go deeper is in qualitative analysis. Every month, my team literally audits who the new followers are. We’ll click through, screenshot, and map them: is this a random bot, or is it a curator at a museum we’re into? Is it a peer foundation in the same city where a program just launched? Is it an artist or critic whose engagement signals cultural alignment? That kind of context is much more valuable than a vanity follower number.

PHILLIPS: Who do you think is doing a good job shaping the future of culture? When I started my business, I got some advice: Sit down and think about who your ideal client is, and work on pursuing them. So who are your ideal clients?

ZIMMERMANN: My ideal clients approach culture with rigor and openness— people that want to build a more interesting, compassionate future. Miuccia Prada and Fondazione Prada’s programs are a compass point for me. I’d love to help other luxury houses build their own digital versions of something similarly multidisciplinary and intellectual. I’m also watching what Yana Peel is doing at Chanel. I just saw her speak at the Aspen Ideas Festival about how she’s translating heritage into global cultural relevance.

But who are my dream clients? The 2028 Los Angeles Olympics. Or developing Claude’s arts program. Creating a tech conference for Gagosian Quarterly. Launching the Nike Arts Biennial, first online, then worldwide.

PHILLIPS: I think it’s cool you’re adjusting to the times. I’m still stuck in traditional PR. I really do find it glamorous.

ZIMMERMANN: For me, glamour always came with grit. I value the education I got in traditional PR—it was glamorous, yes, but it was also sticky notes at 2 AM, navigating egos, and late night marathons that shaped how I operate today. That old New York media world doesn’t exist anymore, and maybe people like you and me are the last generation who will actually remember it for what it was. Maybe that’s why we’re so good at breaking it down and repurposing it for now.

PHILLIPS: There’s just no trenches now. Like, they got rid of Vogue internships. There are so many workaholic stepping stones now that are just gone in New York, and I think it did change the kind of worker Gen Z is.

ZIMMERMANN: Totally. That absence has changed both the kind of worker you get and the kinds of dreams they bring to the table. But if the old system is gone, maybe that’s the opportunity—to invent something different, something better. A new kind of glamor.

Lucien Pagès

 
 

interview by LYAS
photography by Jesper D. Lund

Who is Lucien Pagès? Guru, seer, champion of young fashion talent, Prince of PR—Pagès seems to be everywhere and nowhere at once. How is this possible? And where did he come from? Born and raised in his parents’ hotel in the rural village of Vialas in southern France, he grew up observing the choreography of human ambition. Notable guests included French President François Mitterrand, who arrived by private helicopter. The lodgings also housed a Michelin-starred restaurant. It was an early masterclass in people, perception, and influence—a curriculum that would later shape how he navigates the rarefied world of fashion. Since founding his eponymous agency in 2006, Pagès has not only witnessed the explosive rise of contemporary fashion, he has helped shape it. Representing over 150 brands across fashion, beauty, lifestyle, and beyond, his agency is a reservedly powerful force in the industry. While Pagès himself remains elusive, his name is synonymous with luxury. In a world defined by appearances and curated reputations, Pagès manages to have his cake and eat it too. This duality—control and freedom, invisibility and exposure, strategy and honesty, power and humanity—appears to be his secret weapon. Pagès is also not afraid of the future and welcomes new forms of media. He has been instrumental in opening the door to content creator and mononymic fashion commentator, Lyas, whose social media feed carries formidable clout among a new generation of sartorial enthusiasts. Lyas, who navigates the fashion ecosystem with keen insight, sharp wit, and a touch of red lipstick, has been highly successful in piercing its snobbery and institutional conservatism. Through a careful balance of media-trained and candid responses, Pagès explores with Lyas the balance of truth and manipulation in PR, the art of crisis management, and the pressures of surviving in a fast-paced, highly demanding industry. Pagès’ perspective illuminates the delicate interplay between leverage and authenticity, showing how strategy, empathy, and poise can coexist at the highest levels of fashion.

LYAS Do you think that PR is mostly manipulation? Can you answer in a media-trained way?

LUCIEN PAGÈS No. PR is not manipulation. I always say, because I’m very well trained, PR is the link between a brand’s designer and different types of media.

LYAS And the real answer… (laughs)

PAGÈS There is a bit of manipulation. (laughs) Especially right now, where truth is no longer important. What’s important is perception. You have to be as manipulative as the people who manipulate you. You have to anticipate the manipulation, which is already a manipulation itself. Things used to be easier. Now, something can be right, it can be wrong, whatever, but the perception from the outside is what makes the difference—not the reality.

LYAS What percentage of the job would you say is lying?

PAGÈS Manipulation is not a lie for me. It’s using reality and narrowing, or reworking it into a different narrative. Because when you lie, it never lasts. Eventually, people will find out. You have to extract from reality or you won’t last in this world.

 
 

LYAS Sometimes you get more press than some of your brands. Is that intentional?

PAGÈS The media-trained answer is no. It's absolutely not intentional. I was never proactive with my own communication.

LYAS And now the real answer.

PAGÈS When I accepted to do a pop-up, “Les Vacances de Lucien” at Colette in 2017, I became more exposed, and I needed the press. My brands were at Colette without actually managing to sell there. I asked myself, should I do it or not? But I realized that that exposure is a plus for my marketing career and for my company. Now I’m not as proactive. I’m very cautious about it. It's a slow process and I'm not thinking about it all the time. I know it’s good for the brand because I became the brand. I’m freer to speak than my clients, because they have the CEO telling them what they can and cannot say. I have few limitations, besides not offending my clients. Otherwise, I'm very free. Of course, with my clients, we do media training. And sometimes I ask them not to speak as freely, because it’s a business and economics are on the line. The fashion industry is huge with lots of employees.

LYAS Who terrifies PR the most—the journalists, the influencers, or the clients?

PAGÈS We have to be careful with everyone because they’re all equally important.

LYAS (laughs) Okay. And what’s the real answer?

PAGÈS I think it’s the client. (laughs)

 
 

LYAS How do you choose who gets invited to a show?

PAGÈS The media-trained answer is: we know who has press accreditation or who is accredited by The Fédération [de la Haute Couture et de la Mode]. The other answer is: we adapt to the client. Some clients may need to look cooler because they aren’t cool, or some need to be more established. Some brands need to bring higher-profile people to their show to let the industry know that they matter. It’s a tailor-made approach. And, of course, we invite everyone who is someone. (laughs) When we have limited capacity, we have to narrow our choices. It's becoming more difficult because it's not always about the importance of someone. Some of the most important people will never help you during the season. But then there are people who have a lesser title and they do help you during the season. It's complicated to find the balance between those who support the brand and those who are just important. There are rules. So, if someone is not happy with not being invited, we can always explain. There’s always a reason. Sometimes it's just—you're not important and you don't support the brand. (laughs) We know you just want to attend the show.

LYAS Literally.

PAGÈS You know, when there’s a problem, I ask the team: did this person actually shoot something this season, do they support the brand? Because it’s fine to create a little drama, but if they don’t contribute and still get invited, that’s what bothers me. For me, that’s the rule breaker—it’s not just about a title, it’s about real support. The tricky part is, people can abuse the situation. They push hard for seats, sometimes even threatening, “We’ll tell the designer,” which leads to absurd situations at shows. We don’t always want to escalate things over seating, so sometimes we let it slide. But that weakness in the system gets exploited, especially since designers have their own friendships and personal ties. Which is normal because if a designer wants a friend at their show, that’s their right. But that’s also where the rules stop working.

LYAS Is there anyone you would never invite to a show?

PAGÈS (laughs) I don’t even know how to say it with media training. I can’t decide this for a brand that is not mine, you know? It isn’t my show, so why would I blacklist someone from someone else’s show?

LYAS And the real answer?

PAGÈS There’s people who behave very badly or make trouble for no reason, so we will advise the brand not to invite them. These people are well known to all the PR. But I will not invite someone just because I don't like them, because again, it's not my show.

LYAS Maybe if it was your show, it would be different. (laughs)

PAGÈS Yes, of course. (laughs) It’s touchy. It’s fashion. And we have to be very subtle with all this because it's a relationship. This is what I say to my team: in public relations, there is relation—you have to take care of the relationship. Offending people has never worked.

LYAS How do you handle a bad review?

PAGÈS There is always something to learn from a bad review. (laughs)

LYAS Real answer, please.

PAGÈS I’m stressed now. People are going to read this. For me, it’s not a bad review until it’s personal. If it's about the work, you have to learn from it. For instance, if a journalist doesn't like this style or this designer, it’s valid. But if the review becomes personal, then it’s an issue, and we can decide not to invite this person anymore. It’s about analyzing the situation, because sometimes a review is honest, and sometimes the person has a grudge and it’s not objective anymore, which is unfair. If you feel that the bad review isn’t so wrong, then you have to guide your client into reflection. If you think it’s unfair, then it’s a discussion. But it’s also very weird, because more and more designers will tell you they don’t read the reviews. But I think they do.

 
 

LYAS I think they read it.

PAGÈS I do too. They say they don’t care, and then they follow with, “Oh, look at what Kathy wrote about this other designer.” (laughs)

LYAS They read it only when it’s positive.

PAGÈS The art of reviewing is dying, so we have to cherish and protect it because there is less and less journalism. The industry doesn’t care so much anymore about an opinion. To come back to my first answer, there is always something good to learn from a critic, because you can improve, or the opposite—the designer can react and say he or she doesn’t care and push even harder.

I’m happy that voices from social media, like you, started reviewing. They are sustaining the art of reviewing in their own way. They are also reaching a new generation, which gives me hope that this art is not dead yet.

LYAS We have the freedom to do it because of social media. It’s all about being independent. What was your last crisis meeting?

PAGÈS I think it was this morning. (laughs)

LYAS So, that’s the real answer. (laughs) Now, can you give me the media-trained one?

PAGÈS I haven’t had a crisis for a long time because we are very careful with everything.

LYAS Have you ever thought a designer you worked with was untalented?

PAGÈS No, because I only choose designers who have so much talent. (laughs)

LYAS Okay. And now the…

PAGÈS …The real answer. Yes, of course. Sometimes I see a collection and think that my dog could have done better. (laughs)

LYAS Have you ever thought about quitting fashion?

PAGÈS Yes. Always. Every day. That’s the real answer.

LYAS (laughs) Media training?

PAGÈS Of course, I love fashion. I can’t live without fashion. But both answers are very real. When it’s too painful, sometimes I want to quit because it’s too much work, too much pressure. Then, I think about what I would do instead. I would feel miserable to see myself not participating in it. You have to find the balance.

 
 

LYAS Do you think you need tough skin to survive in this industry?

PAGÈS Yes, you need tough skin, of course. It’s an industry of evaluating people. Fashion is where everything is more intense because of the rhythm. If you work on a movie or a book, it takes years to complete. But in fashion, everything is fast-paced; they are constantly working on collections. If people are paranoid in other industries, they are ultra paranoid in fashion. If you think someone is mean, fashion people are much meaner. That’s why I never liked The Devil Wears Prada (2006) because she's too nice! (laughs)

LYAS That’s an amazing quote.

PAGÈS We both have lived way worse than Miranda Priestly.

LYAS Of course.

PAGÈS You either need tough skin or a lot of protection. A lot of sensitive people think they cannot survive in the fashion industry, but that’s not true, because with sensitivity often comes creativity. Those people often find a way to protect themselves. It’s not just about being a warrior, it’s about knowing the warrior you are. And being strange is a strength in fashion. I see a lot of comments, mostly on TikTok, where people say, “Oh, I could never work in fashion because I know no one,” or “I can’t do PR because I’m too shy.” I tell people, you don’t have to be the Terminator, because it’s a job that requires emotions and sensitivity.

LYAS You hugged me once, do you remember? When I got fired from my first job in fashion.

PAGÈS I told you that it was going to happen.

LYAS That I was going to get a hug or get fired?

PAGÈS Fired. (laughs)

LYAS Yeah, of course. But I felt such humanity from you on that day. Is it hard to stay human in an industry that sometimes tries to suppress humanity?

PAGÈS No, it’s not hard—fashion is beautiful. (laughs) It’s not hard to keep your humanity if you are a human. People expect you to be tough because you’re your own boss and run your own company. Early in my career, I was always told I wasn’t tough enough. But I never wanted to become the “monster” people expect someone in my position to be. I resisted that whole ‘bad cop’ idea. I’d rather be the person who stands with you. Of course, you do have to fight to keep your humanity, because people want to put you in a box. They like the idea of someone with a strong attitude—it makes them feel more comfortable. But that’s also where you risk losing your humanity. In the end, I think that’s why our agencies have been successful: we always leaned into humanity rather than the performance of power.

LYAS The power can get to your head.

PAGÈS Yes, but I’ve been very clear about that since the beginning, because I know it’s fragile. I know that everything you build for years can be lost in one day. You have to be humble because you never know what will happen. I always felt some protection over me because I always behaved well, not because I knew some powerful friend or whatever. If I was a total dick, I think I could have had much more trouble. You receive what you give.

LYAS How do you know if someone really likes you or if they just need you?

PAGÈS I have very good instincts. I can see what’s coming. (laughs) The real answer is that I don’t care. I like to be used.

LYAS (laughs) I love! Actually, me too.

PAGÈS If I can help people with something they need, I can give it to them. If I’m ready to give, I give it. I like friendships in work more than in real life.

LYAS Why?

PAGÈS Because things are clearer. I’m fine with journalists and I can call them for something that I need, and they are aware of my interest. We don't have to fool each other, and through our mutual respect, we become friends, and of course, we help each other.

LYAS Has a relationship that started in work ever become more of a personal one?

PAGÈS Yes. But I prefer to meet people for work reasons, because then it’s clear from the start that we both want something. After that, we can move forward to a true friendship. When people pretend to be your friend from the beginning, for me, it's always a concern.

LYAS That’s an interesting perspective. Have you ever made someone cry?

PAGÈS No, never. (laughs) I do my best to maintain peace and harmony.

LYAS Real answer, please.

PAGÈS Yes, of course. Well, it hasn’t happened many times. It was never on purpose. It was more a lack of knowledge that the person was on the edge. You say something that’s normal, but it's not normal for the person who receives it.

LYAS What’s something in your work you’ve done that you're not proud of?

PAGÈS I’m proud of everything. My successes and my failures. (laughs)

LYAS Okay. So what’s the real answer?

PAGÈS (laughs) Yes, there is.

LYAS Can you give me an example?

PAGÈS No, I can’t. (laughs) There are two things, but I will not tell.

LYAS Just one of them, please?

PAGÈS It’s just things that I could have done better. Because of being tired and stressed, I didn’t make the right decision at the right moment. It’s just this sort of thing that I’m not proud of.

LYAS But Lucien, can you find one to tell us? (laughs)

PAGÈS I have to think about it.

LYAS I have time. I want one crispy little thing.

PAGÈS Okay, I need to think. (laughs) Every mistake I made was under pressure. And I don't forgive myself. Not to excuse myself, but I think that with my job and my position, I have to react well under pressure, but I’m taking full responsibility for my mistakes. It’s just that sometimes people drive me crazy over stupid things.

LYAS Like what?

PAGÈS Like a piece of clothing that never arrived at a shoot. It happens, and it’s my duty to protect my team. You can say, “Come on, it’s just a shirt or a belt,” but sometimes the person is too important and you end up being scared. It’s always the little things, and you often think, “Why do we put ourselves in these pathetic positions because of that?” But that's fashion.

LYAS That’s fashion for you, baby.